Tuesday 27 August 2013

ENGAGEMENT



ENGAGEMENT RING


Meaning
          According to thesaurus, engagement is the act or state of being engaged to be married,[1] also Merriam-Webster put it this way, “the act of engaging : the state of being engaged, with emotional involvement or commitment,” and its synonyms is Betrothal.

          Therefore, an engagement ring is a ring indicating that the person wearing it is engaged to be married, especially in western cultures. In the United Kingdom, Ireland & North America, engagement rings are traditionally worn only by women. In other cultures men and women wear matching rings. In some cultures, engagement rings are also used as wedding rings.
          Conventionally, the woman’s ring is presented as betrothal GIFT by the man to his prospective spouse while he proposes marriage or directly after she accepts his marriage proposal. It represents a formal agreement to marriage.[2] The example of this we find in the scriptures in the case of Rebecca, Genesis 24:47-53, even though the Bible did not say the rings and bracelet and other gift items are specifically for engagement, I think in the bible time, it is a norm to give gift of betrothal to the bride.
          Also many ladies see this as a serious act on the part of the man to be committed to the relationship, as commitment in relationship has been the major concern among ladies now. A man that is ready to part with over $3,000 is seen as really serious about getting married. So the special attachment to it is that the commitment level of the lady increases as she takes the ring as the outward demonstration of great commitment by the man.





Pre-engagement
          Before agreeing to marry, a couple may choose to buy and wear Pre-engagement rings, also called PROMISE rings.[3] We must understand here that pre-engagement is not ENGAGEMENT rings, because it’s not official proposition of marriage, but an agreement before the marriage proposer will come through. Promise ring is a ring given to a romantic partner to signify a commitment to a monogamous RELATIONSHIP, often as a precursor to an engagement ring.[4]
          The ring can be worn on ANY finger, but those symbolizing pre-engagement are generally worn on the left hand middle finger or right hand ring finger to prevent confusion with an actual engagement ring. This is typically done among teenagers who are too young to be legally married, and rarely seen among adults except those that are cohabiting.

History of Engagement Ring
          Engagement band began in ancient Egypt as the circle was used to symbolize a never ending cycle and the space in it as a gateway. Betrothal rings were used during Roman times, but were not generally revived in the western world until the 13th century. Roman men gave engagement rings that include a small key, they believe that the symbolic carved key will protect and cherish the heart of the groom; however it most likely stood for unlocking of wealth because the Romans believed the ring to a symbol of ownership rather than love. Also in England, the ring includes a key which is said to mean taking care of the man’s household and properties. Even though I didn’t agree with this, the rings, according to the Greeks are not REQUIRED to be given before marriage, unlike traditional engagement rings of TODAY![5]
          Until Pope Innocent III in 1215 acknowledged people who promise to marry each other, and declaring the period before their actual solemnization as a waiting period, the ring used is called Betrothal ring, the Pope was the one who established the usage of the engagement ring. The ring then signified the couple’s devotion to one another in that period of time, so engagement ring did not become the standard in the West until the end of 19th century.

Development & use of Diamond Rings
          In Europe, engagement rings were once known as a Posie ring, it was given as a form of promise of fidelity and love. During colonialism in America, a thimble was given as a sign of eternal companionship. Women would remove the tops of the thimble in order to create a ring. The first well-documented
Use of a diamond ring to signify engagement was by the Archuke Maximillian of Austria in imperial court of Vienna in 1477, upon his betrothal to Mary of Burgundy. This influences those of higher social class to give diamond rings to their loved ones.
          The discovery of Diamond mines in Africa in 1870 makes those of lesser means to be able to use diamond rings for engagement too. However, diamond engagement rings were for long time seen as the domain of the nobility and aristocracy, and tradition often favoured simpler engagement bands. The idea of diamond ring as a fitting choice for everybody was recently created around 1930 which is being aggressively promoted by the entertainment industry.

Where & how to wear the rings


          In North America, Ireland & the United Kingdom, it is customarily worn on the left hand ring finger, though customs vary across the world. This is so because ancient Greeks believed that the left hand ring finger contained a vein that led to the heart, but it might be because of its closeness to the heart. It’s only in United States and Canada that only women wear engagement rings alone, other cultures traditionally have both parties wearing identical ones, in Africa I can’t really say, as this culture is a modern and foreign one if not strange.
          But after marriage, the couple may wear both engagement rings and wedding rings, but ideally as I view it, the wedding rings are enough for married couples, because the purpose of engagement had been fulfill when the marriage proposer that was accepted had been consummated. Even though some brides have their wedding rings & engagement rings permanently soldered together after marriage, I hold the belief that Marriage is a greater commitment than engagement.

Selecting an Engagement ring to Wear
          The choice of the type of an engagement ring to be used, greatly depend on the couple and their intended aim of the ring apart from just being for a promise of marriage. Some may want to preserve their family tradition (if there is one), with the choice of rings with sapphires, rubies, emerald and other gemstones, all at the cost that depend on the shape weight, color & clarity. But there are synthetic stones and diamond substitutes such as cubic zirconias, and moissanites are also popular choice that are socially responsible and reduce cost while maintaining the desired appearance.
          The idea that a man should spend a significant fraction of his annual income for an engagement ring originated de novo from De Beers’s marketing materials in the early 20th century, in an effort to increase the sale of Diamonds! Now diamond rings had become a requisite element of betrothal or and of engagement as well as a very visible demonstration of status. Just remember that the tradition did not begin until the middle ages when they were known as Posie rings, then they were not expensive, just simple gold or silver bands with engraving of poetry of love messages.[6]

Colours
          Some cultures take the colour or type of the ring seriously. For example, in Brazil, a silver ring in the right ring finger means the person is on a relationship, and a golden ring on the left ring finger means you are married. Other cultures have their own peculiarities, it was noted that the Romans in the earlier centuries will give two engagement rings: one of gold which is expected to be worn public or social appearances, and also another made of brass or iron that is expected to be worn indoors or around the house when going about doing the daily chores.

Other betrothal Gifts
          There are some religious groups that shun the usage of jewelries; other gifts like a sewing thimble were an acceptable alternative among many others. Also, it should be noted that wedding ring is not included in Muslims’ traditional wedding, though some are wearing it now, but engagement ring is used to denote betrothal widely among them.

Breakage
          Until the Great Depression, a man who broke off a marriage engagement could be sued for breach of promise. Monetary damages included actual expenses incurred in preparing for the wedding, plus damages for emotional distress and loss of other marriage prospects. Damages were greatly increased if the woman had engaged in sexual intercourse with her fiancĂ©.
          In 2007, the average cost of an engagement ring in U.S.A. as reported by the industry was $2,100, but why? In 1935 the law of suing any one who break an engagement was greatly limited, therefore securing diamond rings from prospective suitor became a means of securing a financial security for emotional loss, incase there is a breakage, and traditionally, the ring is not expected to be returned!
          The so called modern trend holds that because an engagement ring is an inherently conditional gift, once the engagement is broken, the ring should be returned to the donour. Thus, the question of who broke the engagement and why, or who was at fault, is irrelevant. But in England and Wales, the gift of an engagement ring is presumed to be an absolute gift to the fiancĂ©e, which I believe is a good one, because no matter the worth of the gift, once it is given, it DOESN”T belong to the giver any more!
 
Costly Assumption
          Many people now see the usage of engagement ring by a woman as being bought and paid for (going by the expensiveness of a diamond ring now, the average of which is $5,000), thereby allowing for sexual intercourse. It may means that since virginity is no longer a requirement for being marriageable in our times, ladies has now taken collecting diamond ring as equal compensation, and pretend as if it doesn’t matter, but in reality it is not so.
          An engagement ring is not a license for living a couple’s life, but it’s only a STRONG indication of the possibility of marriage, which today has been bastardized! Even wedding rings is being returned as fast as it is put in the ring finger. I assume this account for the reason why people put ring in just ANY finger – because it’s no longer a commitment and solemn vow, but of class and status, though those that do that will argue against it.

Conclusion
          Let me acknowledge here that there are feminist that believe that engagement ring (giving and receiving), is gender sensitive. These people believe in the equality of both gender, and so they see the tradition as one that promotes the age long assumption that a woman belong to the kitchen/house – home keeping, and nothing more! They see accepting and engagement ring by any woman as accepting to be subjected to the norm. Since such believe that every thing should be done equally: work and pay bills equally, do chores equally etc. I greatly support that the male counterpart should then be provided with engagement ring also, bought and presented by the lady, or better still propose to the man instead of waiting for the man to do the proposing. And the ring production industry/jewelers are also adapting to the ideology by making two identical engagement rings that can be worn by both the man and the lady.
          One of the best things about adulthood (especially in this generation) is that we are allowed to pick which of the customs of our ancestors and communities we want to ADOPT or ADAPT for ourselves. But the most important thing to me is, when you chose, know the reason what you chose is established and also have your own reason for choosing it or adapting it the way you did, or even for not choosing it!
          Many people following their fantasies attach special meanings to the shape and form of the rings, but this is strictly personal and sentimental. Charles Lewis Tiffany design engagement ring which suspends the diamond high above the band, he knew the importance of a diamond engagement ring and wished for a stage to display its prominence and symbolism. To me a band with the suspended diamond on top of it means a budding love against that of the wedding which is, according to my view, show and symbolizes and unending love.


A marriage is many things, one piece of which is symbols.
Engagement ring, to me is one of such many symbols one should treasure!


[1] Engagement, Merriam-Webster and thesaurus, Encyclopedia Britannica 2012
[2] “Engagement Ring” http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engagement_ring accessed on 26th of August 26, 2013, 8:25am
[3] Ibid.
[4] “pre-engagement ring” http://en.m.wikipedia.org/Pre-engagement_ring accessed on 26th of August 26, 2013, 10:30am
[5] “Engagement Ring” http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engagement_ring accessed on 26th of August 26, 2013, 8:25am

Saturday 24 August 2013

FAITHFULNESS IN LITTLE




“…Little is much when God is in it
Labour not for wealth or fame;
There’s a crown and you can win it,
If you go in Jesus Name!”

            The meaning of that song which I was taught to love since my seminary days, came back to me as I think of writing this piece. But what hit me hard is this thought provoking question: do I benefit from the message of that song? No! I forget the message, I admire and love the emotional drive; but I rationalize the message, I focus on singing it for all to hear!

Faithfulness!
            It is not about being competitive or doing things as others do it, neither is it the standard laid down to be followed without initiative. It is looking at your resources, your capability, opportunities and limitations, and amassing them for highest output possible. It is not success at the standard of others, but success as you!

This is what I mean.
            I was trained as a music minister with four part harmony and arrangement in mind, with even some major musical instrument (keyboard, and trap set, and possibly conga), and with even knowledgeable people (professionals) as members of the choir. But the church I am called to serve have their own ideal music ministry; majorly, you sing your harmony as it comes to you, and the major musical instrument is Gan-gan, (hour-glass drum/ talking drum), even the trap-set must follow it in rhythm and imitation of some of its speech.
            My problem is how on earth will I be able to harness this backward, crook way of making harmony work? Should I train these very dry bones to start singing all songs in part? I tried it, and it failed wonderfully well, because at the performance I find myself conducting the instrument and trying very hard without success to get the voice to sing. I henceforth learned number one lesson as my other colleague also learned; we all want our choir that never handle any four part harmony before to sing Alleluia Chorus!

            Another thing is, how will I teach them to know what I know rather than asking them to follow me by route? Not much potential, not much time; yet weekly services does not wait! My conclusion after many frustration and sense of not working or being the right place where my gift and learning will be much more useful is, my work is not useful here, or I find other means.
             But something is telling me, that conclusion is not right! This might be a test; will you quit, or make lemonade out of this lemon? You preach about David and his worthless associates; you sing little is much, why are you now saying that this little is far too little! Why don’t you find blessedness in this? What is required is not the bigness of the choir, their level of proficiency both in voice and musical instrument; not even in classical or contemporary shout heavy metal music; not even the availability of all classes of musical instrument: guitars, in different types, saxophone, trumpet, clarinet, organ, violins etc. but what can I make out of this nothingness!

Luke 16:10-11
Whoever is faithful in very little is also faithful in much, and whoever is unrighteous in very little is also unrighteous in much.  So if you have not been faithful with the unrighteous money, who will trust you with what is genuine?
(From Holman Christian Standard Bible® Copyright © 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2005 by Holman Bible Publishers)
   
Luke 16:10-11
10 He who is true in a little, is true in much; he who is false in small things, is false in great.11 If, then, you have not been true in your use of the wealth of this life, who will give into your care the true wealth?
BBE
   
Luke 16:11-12
11 If you're a crook in small things,
You’ll be a crook in big things.
12 If you're not honest in small jobs,
Who will put you in charge of the store?
(From THE MESSAGE: The Bible in Contemporary Language © 2002 by Eugene H. Peterson. All rights reserved.)

             You won’t be judge by how successful your choir is in N.B.C. or how famous they were, but what material do you have, and what you did with them! Just keep them improving, give them the ultimate vision… the ideal; but never look down on them for being so far away from the ideal. Remember the choral ensemble in Seminary at inception used to sing Alleluia Chorus in two parts. If you are not faithful in that good for nothing something that is committed to your hand, you don’t need bigger ones to manage. The wise book says, if you are not honest in small jobs, who will put you in charge of the store?
             “LITTLE IS MUCH” is not about bigness alone, but quality, location, attractiveness, popularity, functionality etc.

That guy may not be that handsome,
but little is much!
That pay check may not be fat,
but little is much!
The town your church or work is located may not be that rich and modern,
but little is much!
The work you are ask to do may be below your capacity and standard, 
but little is much!
The time you were given to complete what you are doing may not be much,
but little is much!
The time you have left for serving God may seem so little,
but little is much!
The seed you have in your hand may look inconspicuously unimportant,
but little is much!
Your little ideas may not be as brilliant like that of Bill Gate,
but little is much!
Your educational background may not be rich,
but little is much!

Little, little, oh little is much if we would just be FAITHFUL!

Tuesday 20 August 2013

YOU DON’T NEED MORE MONEY



            Going through the news papers, and being concerned about A.S.U.U.’s strike, I decided to look at what Okonjo-Iweala, the minister for finance, has to say. “ASUU’s #92bn demand is unrealistic” (the Nigerian Tribune, Wednesday, 14th of august, 2013, pg 11). What else? The said additional money is in form of extra allowances! As much as I believe that the wages of a worker should be given to him, yet this makes me realize a question is lurking in the corners of my heart, “will that makes them more successful?”

Let see this as it applies to Arsenal Football Club of England.
            Arsenal has not been able to make any signing in the transfer market, not because they don’t have money… according to report, Arsenal football club alone has enough cash that is as almost as what all the remaining nineteen (19) football clubs in the premier league has. All other football clubs has £181 million altogether, while Arsenal has £154 million, the highest club that follows Arsenal is Manchester United with less than half of Arsenal’s money… £71 million. Even in Europe, no club has as much cash as Arsenal, the highest in Europe has £95 million, Bayern Munich, Real Madrid follows with £94 million, both of whom Arsenal leads with at least almost £60 million! Barcelona has only £31 million cash, don’t forget they still owe Arsenal from the sale of Fabregas.
            But why is Arsenal finding it difficult to attract and buy big players? Luis Suarez was seriously advice against joining Arsenal if he wants trophy. I am an ardent fan of Arsenal, but if you could learn from the state of the club as I have discover these facts and you are able to reach a conclusion or find X in the reason why Arsenal has not been able to sign big players in spite of their money, then you know why you don’t need more money!
 
THEN WHAT DO YOU NEED?
FIND IT YOURSELF OUTSIDE MONEY!


Finding the guy with the best car, good job or income, might not be what you need;
Having the most beautiful, sexy, rich girl might not make you happier;
Traveling abroad might not be break you need;
Pay increment or better work might not guarantee your increase in social status!

Success in life comes not from holding a good hand, but in playing a poor hand well!
Watch out for more!!!